Shobhaa De
Saturday, March 1, 2014
Wednesday, February 26, 2014
Lahore da jawaab nahi!
This appeared in Mumbai Mirror....
I am back after a glorious trip, and here are two images taken at the Lahore Lit Fest. The puss in boots is Mehr Tarar, who became notorious as the ''óther woman'' in the Shashi Tharoor - Sunanda Pushkar tragedy.
**************
The seductive lure of
Lahore…
Inshallah! I am keeping my fingers crossed
I’ll be in Lahore when you read this. The Lahore Literary Festival has grown
into an important property in a very short time, and may soon rival our very
own Jaipur Lit Fest. I jumped at the invitation to participate in its 2014 edition
which has attracted several authors from India,including Vikram Seth and Amit
Choudhary. Of course, Pakistani biggies
like Mohsin Hamid and Kamila Shamsie will be participating as well . I am
looking forward to three sessions (“India a Cultural Conundrum’ being one), and
a book signing at Liberty, the largest bookstore in Lahore, where I am sure
I’ll be asked a hazaar questions on the controversial Wendy Doniger book. I
have been to the Karachi Lit Fest and enjoyed it hugely. I couldn’t make it to
last year’s edition much to my disappointment since my visa didn’t reach on
time. Now,with less than 24 hours left for our flight to Amritsar ( and then on
to that dramatic walk across the Wagah border), I am understandably jittery. The
organizers tell me other invitees like Mira Nair have made it across the border
smoothly and safely. So, here’s hoping my next column will be a post-Lahore
one.
This is my third trip to Lahore . To me, Lahore is like a veiled houri – full
of intrigue, beauty and mystique. Lahore is seriously oomphy. Differences
between Lahore and Karachi are a lot like the differences between Delhi and
Mumbai. Karachi being a commercially driven port city, the mentality of the
people is similar to ours – Dhanda matters. Time is money. People are like
worker ants, rushing around from shop to shop, office to office. The level of
education here is possibly the highest in Pakistan. One meets well qualified
professionals – mainly CAs, bankers, doctors, IT professionals. Most people
converse in Sindhi. The city itself isn’t half as pretty as Lahore. It’s more like
Mumbai, without Mumbai’s glittering skyline and impressive Sea Link. And, of
course, minus Mumbai’s glitz and glamour.
Aaah
– Lahore! Let me put it simply : Lahore is lajawab on many levels. If one
leaves those burly, tough looking cops, fierce Generals and oily politicians
out of the picture, it’s easy to fall in love with Lahore. It is an
extravagantly romantic city. The kind of destination that makes you long for
languorous trysts on moonlit nights, clad in flowing muslin, ittar on the wrist and a poet spouting
flowery verse, with indolent companions
greedily feasting on partridge… and compliments. Lahore is a complex and
layered city, with incredibly creative people doing incredibly creative things
– everyone is a closet shayar. The begums of Lahore are stunningly beautiful
and supremely stylish. They seem to float and glide, not walk or stroll. All
their ‘adas’ make them irresistibly beguiling. They wear their impeccably cut
clothes with enormous elan, while their make - up tricks could give international
make- up artists a serious complex.
The rich in Lahore are seriously, seriously
rich. They enjoy their wealth with complete insouciance. The decadence of the
rich in Lahore takes one back to another era when money spoke an unapologetic
language of power and privilege that was understood by all. The men are ahem…
unambiguously macho, sharply dressed and effortlessly gallant. If these studied,
old-fashioned mannerisms are just an affectation, let’s have some more of the same!
Everyone speaks robust Punjabi. Thinks Punjabi. Lives Punjabi. Extravagance
and sho-sha count for everything. Flashy
lifestyles are openly admired -
discretion is reserved for the faint hearted. Doesn’t it all sound soooo
Delhi!
Culturally, Lahore can be compared to
Istanbul (another favourite destination). It has a vibrant arts scene that
encompasses architecture, sculpture, movies, music and literature. As for the
legendary cuisine and hospitality, once you have sampled the mutton chops and
kebabs of Lahore, you can’t settle for anything less! Like Delhi, the markets
are crowded and teeming with locals shoppingand eating at street stalls
virtually round the clock. Compared to our steep prices, it’s possible to buy
quality fabrics (oh, those amazing cottons!) and designer outfits without spending
too much. As mehmaans from across the border, the warmth extended is genuine, and
all interactions are unfailingly polite. Lahore is self-indulgent and glorious.
Lahore resembles a pampered mistress, while Karachi is the neglected wife. I
enjoy both cities . I am lucky. I don’t have to choose!
Wednesday, February 19, 2014
What's in a book????
That's our Guv on Republic Day 2014....
*************
This appeared in Sunday Times....
What’s in a
book? A lot!!
For starters : Am I offended by Wendy
Doniger’s book? Hell, no! Am I surprised by what happened this week? Naaaah! Is
it the end of the world? You must be joking. Do I think Hinduism is under
threat…or that Wendy set out to insult a great religion? Frankly, the answer is
‘no’ to both. Wendy Doniger is a professional scholar. This is her interpretation. She is entitled
to it. Those who find the book objectionable , need not read it. There are many
Wendys in the publishing space. They do what they have to – spend years
decoding , dissecting, analyzing material.
It is their chosen vocation. A lot of what is deconstructed is necessarily
subjective. After all, it is the effort of one academic searching for
explanations and answers. So be it. If you choose to read the material - and react – do it. Go ahead and write your own
book. Or,write to the scholar/author and refute the thesis. Hold a peaceful
meeting and state your perspective. There are ways and ways to respond –
passionately and spiritedly – without converting your views into an ugly,
self-defeating pitched battle. Which is precisely what has happened with
Doniger’s ‘The Hindus : An Alternative History’.
Now, let’s see it from the Publisher’s
point of view ( I have to state here that I am a Penguin author). But this
battle does not begin or end with Penguin Books and Wendy Doniger . Nor with
those who asked for the book to be withdrawn and pulped – the Shiksha Bachao
Andolan Samiti. The SBAS has been at it for years (remember how 75 paragraphs
were removed from several NCERT textbooks?). They will be at it for several
more. The thing is, this time their victory appeared easy. Was it really a ‘victory’?
And how easy was it? What about the Publisher? The rather facile argument is
that Penguin should not have buckled under pressure. That in ‘the old days’
Publishers were bold enough to stand by authors and books, regardless. Well,
it’s time to state the bald truth and say it like it is (sorry,
intellectuals!). Those old days are over. And the world of publishing has
changed. Knock off all the romantic notions surrounding the book business and
what do you get? A business under financial threat across the world. A business
trying to stay afloat in the face of competition coming at it from unexpected
directions and in entirely unknown forms (come on, who could have anticipated
e-books and free downloads?). Survival itself is at stake given these daunting
developments. Besides, let’s be candid, at the end of the day, publishing IS a
business. And every publisher in the universe is a ‘baniya publisher’ ( a term that has been thrown
around a lot these days). And hello! which publisher would actively back a book
that has a zero sales’ potential? Which
publisher is willing to lose money on a book? Which publisher wants a
book/author to get into trouble? Not one. Every book is a gamble. It is
published in good faith. Publishers don’t consciously court controversy. They
don’t enjoy facing criminal charges (as in this case). And they certainly don’t
like losing money! A great deal of it. If that makes them ‘baniya publishers’,
that’s okay. And yes, in today’s aggressive environment in which everything is
potentially a ‘product’ that has to be flogged in the marketplace, there really
isn’t that much of a difference left between selling a book and selling a bar
of soap. If that sounds awful, it is a reality one has to accept. Authors and
public intellectuals taking a lofty view of the publishing industry, should
climb down a few notches and smell the coffee. It is likely to get still worse
by the ‘old’ standards, as decisions whether or not to publish a book are taken
by marketing mavens crunching numbers and not visionary publishers willing to
back a tome they believe in. Yes, it’s that grim. Publishers with a book like
Wendy’s on their list, are particularly vulnerable. It is not about having
financial resources to fight it out in court. It is about asking basic ,
practical questions : is it worth it?
Wendy’s controversial book will do just
fine . More people will read it now that it has become a hot potato. The SBAS
will no doubt, look for other soft targets and gloat over this particular win.
The ‘scholar dollars’ won’t dry up. So, relax. Hinduism has survived worse .
And will continue to thrive - book or no book. Our various freedoms are
definitely under threat. Make no mistake about that. It’s just a question of
figuring out whose freedom scores in such wars. And whether there is something
called absolute freedom in the first place .A difficult decision needed to be
taken .And it was taken. It was not ‘fear’ alone ( despite the rumoured death
threats ) that dictated Penguin’s decision, I imagine. It was a question
of not hurting public sentiment. There
really are no winners here. Least of all the much loathed SBAS.
Wednesday, February 12, 2014
A tale of 7 missing buffaloes!
Talented photo- journalist Santanu Das, who has just published his wonderful book on Udvada. Santanu deserves better recognition and support.
He would love to take on more commissioned work, now that he has quit his day job with the Times of India.
**************
He would love to take on more commissioned work, now that he has quit his day job with the Times of India.
**************
This appeared in the Asian Age...
All it takes is 7 missing
buffaloes….!
The Lord be praised! Seven stolen buffaloes
of Urban Development Minister, Azam Khan,
were finally located after a massive, night long buffalo hunt which was
launched by Rampur SSP Sadhna Goswami, using the services of a crack team , including sniffer dogs. The
retrieved buffaloes cost three Uttar Pradesh policemen their postings, to say
nothing of their prestige within the force. Their crime? They were on night
patrol duty at the time the buffaloes went missing. We don’t know what the
buffaloes feel about their kidnapping and eventual rescue, but clearly, the
Ministerji is vastly relieved. Obviously, this particular gentleman was very
attached to his buffaloes. So attached, in fact, that he thought nothing of
using state machinery on a priority basis to search for his cattle, keeping
everything else on hold. Five police teams fanned out to conduct raids across
Rampur. Investigators from the district police’s crime cell were also called
in, as the enraged Minister expressed his anguish in no uncertain terms. This
level of police servility towards
political bosses is not restricted to Uttar Pradesh, alone. In Maharashtra, we
are witnessing blatant political manipulation / interference in police
appointments as Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan takes his own sweet time to
name a Police Commissioner. As always,
the voice of citizens will be ignored while political parties fight over what
is possibly the most coveted police appointment in the country.
Which is why Azam Khan’s blatant misuse of
his position has not shocked the rest of India. In Uttar Pradesh, of course,
this form of netagiri has traditionally
been condoned. Uttar Pradesh with its
hopelessly feudal thinking will naturally accept Azam Khan ordering local
police personnel to find his missing buffaloes – or else! Never mind that his
atrocious behaviour draws attention to the apathy displayed by the State
administration towards riot victims still suffering in Muzaffarnagar camps. For
Azam Khan, the lives of those orphaned, starving children are obviously worth
much less than the price of his precious buffaloes. While we keep talking
nonchalantly about the many Indias that co-exist cheek-by-jowl within a radius
of five miles, do we forget the century we are living in? The context? The
crisis? Of course, we do. Azam Khan is
emblematic of this anomaly. He thinks and behaves like a medieval zamindar, focused
on rural concerns that are narrow and selfish in the extreme. How can this man be in charge of urban
development? Does nobody see the irony of his portfolio? And if somebody does,
should he not be removed from this ministry immediately? Does he even know the
meaning – separately and together – of those two words ?
Perhaps, Azam Khan has inadvertently become the face of
Elections 2014. And in Azam Khan’s deplorable conduct, we can read the
terrifying text of the real conflict that faces India today. Simply put, it is
the vast rural-urban divide. The chasm
has grown to an extent that now appears unbridgeable to voters. It is going to
be the dramatic contest between the Chaiwalla and the Latte drinker, isn’t it ?
Between buffaloes and Bentleys. There seems to be no in- between option at this point. Narendra Modi
has shrewdly positioned himself as that Chaiwalla who represents the
majority. While poor Rahul Gandhi struggles to strike a credible balance
between his love for the Italian Cappuccino and his desi obligations. If one can understand that,
one can decode what took place in Rampur. What is scary is the fact that more
people in Uttar Pradesh condone Azam Khan, than condemn him. “It is our way of life in these parts,” they
shrug. And so it is!
In a bizarre development, Aam Aadmi Arvind
Kejriwal shocked admirers by justifying the power of Khap Panchayats by
providing a pseudo-cultural context to them.We are likely to witness many more
such stands getting direct endorsements from politicians as a run up to
Elections 2014. Hardly anybody is talking about development in real terms.
Nobody has made women’s issues central to their political agenda. So far, they
have opted for tokenism and talked around both subjects, gauging (accurately,
perhaps) that these count for little in an election that is about asserting
religious identity above all else. If that makes you uncomfortable, too bad.
So, no amount of ‘zeher ki kheti’
speeches will impress or influence the
voter. The numbers will only kick in from those looking for a leader who
promises everyone a quick fix. A quick fix that comes with an important rider –
Hindutva. Everything else is icing on
the cake - just a way to dress up the
main dish and make it more appetizing. Narendra Modi has sensed the mood. Sonia
Gandhi can call him a ‘Maut ka Saudagar’ a thousand times over. But this
Chaiwalla has cleverly figured Indians don’t give a damn about ‘zeher’ - they
love tea. And Indians also love ‘natak’. If Modi sounds more and more like a Gujarati stage actor performing at Mumbai’s
famous Bhang Wadi in the ‘80s, it is by design. Modi’s campaign is specifically
geared to win over the Lost Indian. The one who’s unable to figure out the better
option - should it be a pricy Latte at a neighbourhood Starbucks or a
cutting chai at a local dukaan? Modi has the answer! It is obvious: the era of
snobby public school lads and Oxbridge intellectuals running the show from
Delhi is finally over.
There’s not much of a difference between Azam
Khan and Narendra Modi, after all. In India, the buffalo always wins.
Sunday, February 2, 2014
Rahul Gandhi: Simpleton or Sawant???
This appeared in Sunday Times today...
The AG-RG faceoff: Naani ki Yaad Aa Gayee
Simpleton or Savant? You decide!!!
So… shall we say dumb is the new brilliant???
Frankly speaking, ‘those’ revealing 80 minutes last week stumped the nation in
more ways than one. Arnab Goswami,the country’s conscience-keeper, was at his
avuncular best when he spoke to the man who would be PM , like a kindly uncleji dealing with a
simple minded nephew.Not bad as
interview strategies go. A rope was given. It was gratefully grabbed. And the
public hanging was complete. Rahul Gandhi broke several protective, motherly
hearts (mine included), as he blindly rushed towards a point of no return,
watched by a billion jeering people. The noose was tightened pretty early, but
our sweet, trusting Rahul Baba didn’t realize what was happening till it was
too late and he was left sweating at the gallows by an uncharacteristically
calm interrogator-assassin. Without getting into ‘specifics’ ( sorry, Arnab!) of
the lethal interview, let it be asked what made Rahul Gandhi take this self-destructive
step in the first place? There are theories galore (“ He has nothing to lose…he knows it’s all
over for the Congress.”). But Rahul- watchers remain baffled . The thing is,
this was a seminal interview. One assumes there was no death wish
involved. Someone obviously talked Rahul
into exposing himself on prime time television. Who is that someone? Off with
his head! Can’t possibly be a friend or well-wisher. Once Rahul put his foot
into it, he was stuck! Worse, he promptly forgot the script and mangled his
lines.But let’s be fair and give him some brownie points for actually finishing
the interview and not running away, unlike India’s top orator and Rahul’s chief
rival – Narendra Modi.Unfortunately, this interview is likely to haunt Rahul
Gandhi for the rest of his life.
Since then, there have been countless
attempts by Rahul baiters, haters, and rabid critics to dance on his grave and
kiss him a quick goodbye. But what is far more interesting is the attempt by
minders and admirers to provide an entirely different spin to the disaster. It
has been suggested that Rahul Gandhi is NOT really dumb. He only sounds it! He actually fakes
stupidity! That’s how brilliant he is!! Why? Because that is a part of his
larger, grander design to woo his core electorate. This is how it goes : Rahul
was advised by some super brains in the party to submit himself to the Arnab barbeque and then go flat out to appear
daft. He was assured the nation was sick of listening to bombastic, old school netas
making tall claims and sounding insincere. Young India, they told Rahul, was
singularly unimpressed by crafty, nasty, oily politicians spouting clichés, and
pretending they had all the answers. Rahul had to create a different slot, even
if that meant making an absolute ass of
himself. His stubborn stone walling, is also being showcased as the master
stroke of the century. For, no matter what Arnab threw at Rahul, the answers
remained the same. This was no accident, insist his advisors. Rahul got the
better of an exasperated Arnab by frustrating him…. wearing him down…by coolly
repeating himself over and over again. Rahul, they now claim, effortlessly
managed to hammer home his message to those who matter the most in the next
election – the youth. Rahul also revealed his personal demons, confusions,
contradictions, fears, hopes, dreams, concerns, anxieties, vulnerabilities…even
his monumental ignorance! This, say his friends, made Rahul more relatable and
real. The idea was to project him as a sensitive, passionate seeker of a higher
truth, leaving lesser beings to grapple with ground level issues of leadership,
governance and other boring stuff. Gushed an acolyte, “How many leaders have
the guts to bare their souls on national television?” True. They have better
sense.
While the attempts to intellectualise /
contextualize his responses (an absurd face- saving device!) go on, an entire
RG industry has sprung up online. People who are being kind to Rahul, have been
offering excuses and trying in vain to deconstruct those cringe- making gaffes.
They are also providing a clever subtext
to the entire exercise. Hours have been invested searching for deeper, hidden
meanings, while analysing each empty utterance. These strenuous interpretations
are being dished out by those who would like to believe this was not a case of “ The Prince has no clothes”. Alas, the less charitable openly mock his
“Power is poison” refrain, pointing out how the Gandhi family had developed an
effective anti-dote to poison fifty years ago.
So what happens to Rahul Baba now? Will the wicked ‘system’ which he is very much
a part of, but likes to denounce, allow him to lick his wounds in peace and get
on with life? Or will the collective scorn of opponents force him to adopt ‘their’
ways and become ‘one of them’? A creature and creation of dynasty politics
himself, Rahul thought nothing of rubbishing the notion with a straight face.
Now, that requires ‘solid’ acting ! In many ways, and on several levels, Rahul
Gandhi paid rich and direct tributes to familiar Gandhi traditions. The nation
got a lump in its throat. Seriously - Naani ki yaad aayi.
Monday, January 27, 2014
Shiv Menon - what happens to him?
This appeared in The Week
As expected, the story is as good as dead in the media.... how swiftly we move on...
Sunanda’s sad
saga….
As I write this, my thoughts are focused on
Shiv Menon – orphaned at the tender age of twenty-one. Shiv is Sunanda Pushkar’s
son from one of her earlier marriages. His father died in a car accident years
ago. And last week, Shiv lost his mother, Sunanda, who was found dead in her
lavish suite at the opulent Lee la Palace Hotel in Delhi. Her death was
described by the Delhi police as “sudden and unnatural’’. Television coverage
of his mother’s funeral, showed a tiny young person bravely fighting back tears
as he dutifully performed the prescribed last rites, along with Sunanda’s husband. I am sure a lot of hearts went out
to the frail lad while he struggled to retain his composure as flashbulbs
popped incessantly, capturing every grimace and tear. Sure, he is not the first
young man to be orphaned. But given the harsh glare of publicity that
surrounded his 52-year-old mother’s tragic death, it was inevitable that Shiv’s
every reaction and move would be relentlessly tracked, even before the poor
fellow had had the chance to absorb the enormity of the tragedy.
What happens to Shiv next? I am looking at
it in purely practical terms. Where will he live from now on? How? With whom?
What’s ‘home’ for him? Did he ever really have one he belonged to ? How will
society treat him? Is moving in with his grand- father – Sunanda’s dad – the only answer? Or will
his step-father assume charge? Take responsibility? What about his two
step-brothers? And the extended political family / community in Delhi? The same
people who once fawned over his glamourous mother and kootchi-kooed him – will
they have time for him now that Sunanda is no more? Does he have friends – good
friends – who can see him through these difficult times? What happens to his
plans of making it in Bollywood? Will
film makers still open doors for him without his well-connected mother to steer
his career and utilize her countless contacts? That’s the downside. Let’s look
at the upside. This may prove to be Shiv’s biggest test to grow up. And grow up fast. Sunanda was known to be a
loving mother who doted on her only child. Through all her tumultuous times,
Shiv had been her one constant. The steadying, sobering factor. Watching his
spirited mother’s descent into physical and emotional hell must have taken a
gigantic toll on the boy. It is never easy on a child whose single parent
happens to be a high profile celebrity, living in a glass house, with enough
detractors ready to throw stones at her.
As it had happened to Sunanda during her final, agonizing days. I keep
wondering what Shiv must have gone through as Sunanda engaged in ugly
spats with the ‘other woman’ who was hitting
back viciously, often aiming way below the belt.
I
feel for Shiv. His mother was a fragile and vulnerable woman behind the tough,
brazen façade. He had seen her swing from euphoria to depression, panic to
exultation. God knows what sort of storms he had witnessed as her latest
marriage was falling apart. And God knows how he will find the strength to
battle all those demons that may haunt him for the rest of his life. I can’t
help thinking of Prateik, Smita Patil’s young son, who lost his mother just
after she gave birth to him. Raised by Smita’s aged parents, Prateik’s growing
up years were defined by confusion and rebellion. Today, he may be a recognized
name in Bollywood. But Prateik is also fighting several ghosts as he struggles
to make something of his life in a highly competitive industry. Both these boys
represent the complex emotional dilemmas young people have to confront in these
troubling times. If Shiv can successfully negotiate the next phase of his life
without cracking up, he’ll emerge that much stronger. At this point, nobody
knows the exact status of Sunanda’s
legacy – did she leave behind a valid
will? Will her son be financially secure? Does he have any contact with his
late father’s family? Cousins and other relatives he can count on ? Where are
his dependable support systems when he needs them the most?
Sunanda’s dramatic life and sudden death
attracted a huge amount of negative attention… and there was Shiv, a lost child
at the centre of this terrible vortex, desperately trying to make some sense of
the ghastly turn of events. His mother was incredibly proud of him…she had big
dreams for her boy. She had even bigger dreams for herself. Shiv will be flying
solo from now on. Even the people who may be consoling him currently,will eventually
move on… as it inevitably happens. He needs all the courage in the world to
cope on his own as he navigates life’s shark infested waters. The loss of the most important person in his tender life is
impossible to fill. But I hope he knows there are people out there who
genuinely care.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


.jpg)
.jpg)
